Brent Corrigan, Shower

Culture media, real

Today, my attention was drawn by the network on two complaints of mold culture.

The first complaint comes from a discussion on Facebook on cinema that can be expanded in culture in general. A friend complains that the programming of a cinema of our city "follow the logic of the application of the average user who, apparently, is stock up on film mediocre and banal, often very Italian" blaming with inadequate support advertising in certain films that then makes them go "muted 99% of the time" aborting "Fuck the average tastes of the average programmers and fuck movies of Multiplex Roma Vicenza, Stradella of Filipinos, 1" (in the name of transparency goes!).

Under his rein many of his friends gave him reason for supporting him explaining that "the taste of the average is not even the taste of the average, but what of the average industry wants to impose" because "L 'Italian average, in fact, must be put in a position to choose freely " but the rest of the statistics that say it also " is more an article on the latest antics of Brizzi's interview with Martin Scorsese, and mtv Justin Bieber them win awards and not the Arcade Fire. because people will film-music-tv & co like diversionary to escape from everyday life with the brain in which they / we are muddy, and prefers to remove the brain rather than engage him. is what is commonly called entertainment, " better if you read as" in-detention cerebral .

I could not give a reason for all the speeches, because in reality a standardized and complied with, and who is not found has different personal tastes and alternative understood as " alternative to standardized" in tone and not sophisticated, it is not even considered, because it is out of business, not a variable to be considered because it falls within the virtuous circle for the mass-business, it's not worth spending money because does not return (enough).

I like that this debate is founded on the very day of the strike of the show against the cuts at the expense of the government sector that will cause serious damage to cultural heritage and historical Italian.

I am afraid this policy of zero interest to entertainment and culture for a people without culture and a design and historical evolution of their country but not only, with a very short-term memory, is more manageable and malleable.

This discussion shows in its small way the hunger for culture that is there and if we put it in terms rougher, the business that may come around.

Finance Minister Tremonti said "with the culture you do not eat" and I think he's right: how to live when so many employees of museums, like him, get in for free because they have the party card or are u Paracha them, while ordinary people go there a few times a year because the ticket is more expensive also because of the lack of public subsidies and to recover the loss of income of Paraculo?

dusting off the old utopia that if you halve the deputies and senators, and also halve their salaries, we would find enough money with a good rest! But make contributions to the culture to promote such popular films as I find it a waste cinepannettoni despicable towards those who are truly committed to making culture and move people's consciences.
In Pompeii I think, I hope, have the same thought ...

The second one comes from friend lamenting that according to the analysis of the share of Monday evening, who shared the moralism Fazio & torque Saviano is part of the educated upper middle class and educated " while" the common people, the poor ignorant people but instead the GF11 ".

analysis came from a transmission of RAI-3 and therefore was biased, but the tenant should make clear that it did not look Italiot F & D has seen to force the GF, it 'that has stopped inevitably to eighth grade! It could also be the cinema or theater. Or make love.

addition, this comment shows how poor people were not in front of the TV on Monday night, but also inside on Saturday afternoon.

I am not a cultured and educated upper middle class but I look at the F & S because I try to understand the purpose: the first two episodes, I think a show based on knowledge of the underworld Saviano, which may be fine, but to a certain point.

F & S have formed a beautiful couple: one has the face of a what is the matter for a ride (= F) while the other seems too set (= S), both in spite of the guests, they also seem rather biased expression by false modesty, "Look how good we are" , especially the nice face. Then I do not trust the people exaggerate poses and moves like them both.

What I like about the program is that it is sensitive issue for our country, some still taboo for the backward state of mind of the boot, it seems sincere honesty and a good dose of irony, without hiding behind veils hypocrites hearing the story and review of the protagonists of the events and not that of someone who pretends to be Starletta.

the end are so many questions, which I think is one of the purposes of the program ... at least that's what happens to me, I find myself asking what I think, what I'd do it for them. It is not a passive listening but stirs their consciences.

However, if the program stops here and does not go anywhere without consequences, for example, it makes the legal euthanasia (and call it by its name!) Or not there are contributions to culture, is an end in itself and is useless. And we'll figure of Boccalon again.